+ Reply to Thread
Page 1 of 2 1 2 LastLast
Results 1 to 10 of 12

Thread: sent over here from the FSC forum. 6.0 carb swap

  1. #1

    sent over here from the FSC forum. 6.0 carb swap

    Hi all. new on here and wanting to swing a 6.0 into my new to me 91 RCSB. Is anyone converting 6.0 to carb set ups? I know the parts are out there to do it just dont know much about the conversion. I know i'll lose efficiency but I think I'll gain torque and horsepower. @least that what im reading in mags. If thats been discussed already on here, point me in the right direction and i can do the home work. thanks

  2. #2
    Join Date
    Nov 2007
    Location
    THE MEAN STREETS OF OKLAHOMA
    Posts
    11,120
    PM phantom405, he did a carb swap on his truck and could prolly give you the best info, because his was a very recent swap. thank god you got away from FSC
    THEY CALL ME G.

    AZRAEL

    2017 RZR 1000 2 SEATER
    2023 RZR 1000 XP 4
    2008 LTZ DURAMAX 3500
    2023 300S 5.7
    2023 BUICK ENCORE[/B]

    The difference between winning and losing, is having a 2nd stage.

  3. #3
    Join Date
    Jan 2005
    Location
    Humble/Houston TX
    Posts
    2,586
    im in the middle of a conversion myself. look into the victor jr or super victor intakes for a carb setup. carb is up to you. for ignition controls look at the MSD 6010 or 6012 depending on your reluctor.

    old mod list: H/C/I/N/E/G 408
    new mod list: 5.3, gears/posi, mufler and tune : (

  4. #4
    Join Date
    May 2009
    Posts
    428
    welcome to the club!!

  5. #5
    Join Date
    Mar 2011
    Location
    Hamilton, Ontario
    Posts
    72
    hey i completed the swap as well but in a 4x4. i used the performer intake. i decided dual plane was better then single plane for my application and as mentioned go with the msd 6010 if you are using an engine with 24x reluctor wheel and the msd 6012 if it is a 58x reluctor. this box gives you more tuning capabilities. the most inportant thing you will have to figure out is what transmission you want to run. as for the carb set up other then the intake, msd box,carb and fuel pressure regulator all your conversion stuff would be the same if you went EFI

  6. #6
    thanks for the info at least it gets me going in a direction vs a circle.

  7. #7
    Join Date
    Mar 2011
    Location
    Hamilton, Ontario
    Posts
    72
    if you plan to run a 4l60e i would stay with the fuel injection. if not carb is a good way to go.

  8. #8
    Join Date
    Jan 2005
    Location
    Humble/Houston TX
    Posts
    2,586
    Quote Originally Posted by 89sierra View Post
    if you plan to run a 4l60e i would stay with the fuel injection. if not carb is a good way to go.
    what's you're reasoning behind this?

    old mod list: H/C/I/N/E/G 408
    new mod list: 5.3, gears/posi, mufler and tune : (

  9. #9
    I'm going carb because it fun to play with easy to change and tune. T'll run the stock trans for now 700R4 unitl it dies then build a better one down the road. The trucks just a toy so the benefits of efi dont really apply. plus some thing with a carb'd v8 fills the void of my camaro i no longer have to play with.

  10. #10
    Join Date
    Mar 2011
    Location
    Hamilton, Ontario
    Posts
    72
    the only reason i said this is because if you want to run a 4l60e to say fuel injection and keep the factory computer to control the transmission. with the 60e behind a carb you need a 600$ controller and then you need a tps to make it work properly. and guys running the controllers say they dont work completely right. i decided to beef up the 700 and run that because there is no controller or anything but a cable needed to control the transmission

+ Reply to Thread

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts