Here you go guys, a stock 6.0L graph vs an STS equipped with 5psi.
Jerry was nice enough to come all the way from Louisiana and dyno this thing.
I've added text to the pics so you can easily see how much it gained.
This is a '99HD 6L with an STS Turbo and 5psi.
thanks,
allen
edited, I posted the wrong graph here's the updated one.
Nelson Performance
FastestTruckList.com
NP on Facebook
Youtube Channel
'94 Chevy Truck: 8.9 et, 408 twins
ALLEN IT'S 2000 HD 6.0LYOU'LL GET IT RIGHT ONE OF THESE DAYS, HAHA. I WISH I COULD REDYNO IT BECAUSE IT REALLY PICKED UP SOME POWER AFTER THE RELEARN. NOTHING LIKE 2ND GEAR RUBBER AT 3/4 THROTTLE.
2000 Chevy Silverado 2500 ECLB w/6.0 , 4L80E auto, 4.10 G80, K&N, Nelson Dyno Tune, 02 PCM STS TURBO , 44# injectors, IC ,HPTuner and 160* thermo 348 rwhp, 394 rwtq @ 5 psi
60'=2.241
1/8=9.352@77.39
1/4=14.40@ 96.67
Great numbers Jerry. Did you make it to the track the other night? I want to know what that beast runs.
Jason
No i had a lot of drawings i had to get out. but i will make it next week. Beside i think it rained at the track wednesday
2000 Chevy Silverado 2500 ECLB w/6.0 , 4L80E auto, 4.10 G80, K&N, Nelson Dyno Tune, 02 PCM STS TURBO , 44# injectors, IC ,HPTuner and 160* thermo 348 rwhp, 394 rwtq @ 5 psi
60'=2.241
1/8=9.352@77.39
1/4=14.40@ 96.67
Nice, it's got some mad torque where it counts!
The superior man is modest in his speech, but exceeds in his actions. - Confucius
"He who asks of life nothing but the improvement of his own nature, is less liable than anyone else to miss and waste life."- Henri Frederic Amiel
'01 Chev Z71 LT - '85 BMW 745i TURBO - '88 BMW 750iL - '88 Ford F150 XLT Lariat - '79 MB 240D - '79 MB 280S Euro
'80 MB 380SE-5.0 Euro - '85 MB 300SD - '87 MB 300SDL - 1990 MB 300SEL - '91 MB 300SE - '91 MB 560SEL
Let's face it, the red hair... makes 'em wet.
Jerry, Great numbers after the sts. Looking at the graph it looks like you had 220 HP stock. I thought the 2000 6.0 were around 285 to 300 HP stock from the factory.
Is it that the advertised HP is at the flywheel and your measuring at the rear wheels? I would have thought stock HP would have been more
jeff
2005 ECSB 5.3
What did you lay out rwhp/rwtq stock?Originally posted by WHT6.0HD@Sep 3 2004, 10:58 PM
Jerry, Great numbers after the sts. Looking at the graph it looks like you had 220 HP stock. I thought the 2000 6.0 were around 285 to 300 HP stock from the factory.
Is it that the advertised HP is at the flywheel and your measuring at the rear wheels? I would have thought stock HP would have been more
jeff
The superior man is modest in his speech, but exceeds in his actions. - Confucius
"He who asks of life nothing but the improvement of his own nature, is less liable than anyone else to miss and waste life."- Henri Frederic Amiel
'01 Chev Z71 LT - '85 BMW 745i TURBO - '88 BMW 750iL - '88 Ford F150 XLT Lariat - '79 MB 240D - '79 MB 280S Euro
'80 MB 380SE-5.0 Euro - '85 MB 300SD - '87 MB 300SDL - 1990 MB 300SEL - '91 MB 300SE - '91 MB 560SEL
Let's face it, the red hair... makes 'em wet.
I have not had the truck on a dyno. When I purchased the 6.0 HD new in 2001 it was advertised at 300 HP. Dont know about factory tq ratings.
Just curious, I have no idea if the advertisments are even close to reality
jeff
2005 ECSB 5.3
that advertised hp is at the crank not at the wheels...they dont tell you that..
'13 silverado LT...stock
'11 lt 4x4 z71..tvs1900
'01 gmc twins 6.0 jakes 400 ladder bars w/ coilovers tuned by nelson performance
So is it possible to lose around 20% of HP through the drive train?
2005 ECSB 5.3
Posting Permissions
Reply With Quote
