+ Reply to Thread
Page 3 of 3 FirstFirst 1 2 3
Results 21 to 22 of 22

Thread: Part II: Dyno'd it....AF Ratio Problem...

  1. #21
    Join Date
    Nov 2003
    Location
    Denton Texas
    Posts
    20,540
    You're really not more than stock, me either. Stock heads flowing through stock manifolds just don't breath that great. About 20% drivetrain loss with the wheel dyno. 240 hp is roughly 300 at the crank. I don't know what your engine was rated by the factory but you're getting most of it to the ground. My truck would probably put down better numbers with the stock cam than this turbo cam I'm running plus my dual springs are probably eating up some HP, too.
    See my truck data in the "My Garage" section here... http://www.ls1truck.com/forums/my-ga...tml#post191709

  2. #22
    Join Date
    Mar 2006
    Location
    Mesquite
    Posts
    8,176
    <div class='quotetop'>QUOTE(RedHeartbeat &#064; Jun 29 2006, 10&#58;01 PM) [snapback]56778[/snapback]</div>
    You&#39;re really not more than stock, me either. Stock heads flowing through stock manifolds just don&#39;t breath that great. About 20% drivetrain loss with the wheel dyno. 240 hp is roughly 300 at the crank. I don&#39;t know what your engine was rated by the factory but you&#39;re getting most of it to the ground. My truck would probably put down better numbers with the stock cam than this turbo cam I&#39;m running plus my dual springs are probably eating up some HP, too.
    [/b]
    Stock on mine is 285 at the crank, I believe.

+ Reply to Thread

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts