+ Reply to Thread
Page 1 of 5 1 2 3 ... LastLast
Results 1 to 10 of 44

Thread: NA cam VS FI

  1. #1

    NA cam VS FI

    I was just wondering what makes a good na cam vs a good Fi cam. becuase i see guys runing 112 lsa lots of duration and high lift with turbos, my thought that was a good na cam. So FI i thought you want a loose lsa and high lift. Someone clarify for me.
    Last edited by 6.0vortecchevy; 10-26-2011 at 07:39 PM.

  2. #2
    Join Date
    May 2008
    Location
    Crowder, OK
    Posts
    8,005
    The overlap + LSA is what is important.

    1969 Chevy RCLB C10 350/TH400 SOLD
    2007 Chevy RCSB 4.8 4x4 LS SOLD
    2008 Chevy RCSB 5.3 4x4 LT SOLD
    2010 Chevy CCSB 6.2 4x4 LT SOLD
    2005 GMC CCLB DRW 6.6 Duramax 4x4 191,000 and counting
    2013 FORD CCSB F350 6.7 Powerstroke 4x4


  3. #3
    Join Date
    Nov 2007
    Location
    Pittsburgh, PA
    Posts
    3,581
    untill you start seeing over 1k hp then the cam isnt as important as some may think. Hell i used a trex and had no issues with spool or boost....theres alot of myths out there that get passed on from ppl to ppl, then ppl live by those. its actually the ppl who think outside the norm are the ones usually with great success...it just took a few trys to get it right were as others just follow
    2002 Lightning - GT headed 5.5Litre w/ Twin 7665s
    2002 Silverado - 427Lsx w/ Twin gt4202s
    2010 Silverado crewcab Z71 - 5.3litre w/ procharger
    2000 Wrangler - 5.3litre with some stance
    2014 Xsport- 3.5 Eco boost
    412 Motorsports

    it ain't that I'm too big to listen to the rumors, It's just that I'm too damn big to pay attention to 'em..That's the difference

  4. #4
    I did the cam calculator and i if i remember right it said my cam had negative over lap. specs are 112 218/227 in/ex 525

  5. #5
    Quote Originally Posted by Quik View Post
    untill you start seeing over 1k hp then the cam isnt as important as some may think. Hell i used a trex and had no issues with spool or boost....theres alot of myths out there that get passed on from ppl to ppl, then ppl live by those. its actually the ppl who think outside the norm are the ones usually with great success...it just took a few trys to get it right were as others just follow
    so what your saying there really is no FI or NA cam. Ino some could work better then others but wouldnt a cam with alot of over lap bleed boost?

    BTW it said my cam has -1.50 overlap, ino what overlap is but what exactly is the 1.50 degrees?
    Last edited by 6.0vortecchevy; 10-26-2011 at 07:54 PM.

  6. #6
    Join Date
    Nov 2007
    Location
    Pittsburgh, PA
    Posts
    3,581
    it all depends on what your shooting for. Id rather have some overlap then neg for something that is going to make big power. If i was going to boost something heavy i would defferently spec a cam differently then a RCSB or even a fbody. Spend some time on sites like theturboforums, yellowbullet and the FI on tech. youll see certain ppl replying about using cams with overlap and there success. in a blower situation youll bleed boost but a turbo setup will still make boost as its regulated by the wastegate. if you dump the boost into the exhaust youll spool faster. bleeding boost also helps reduce back pressure allowing more rpm and resulting in more power.
    Quote Originally Posted by 6.0vortecchevy View Post
    so what your saying there really is no FI or NA cam. Ino some could work better then others but wouldnt a cam with alot of over lap bleed boost?

    BTW it said my cam has -1.50 overlap, ino what overlap is but what exactly is the 1.50 degrees?
    2002 Lightning - GT headed 5.5Litre w/ Twin 7665s
    2002 Silverado - 427Lsx w/ Twin gt4202s
    2010 Silverado crewcab Z71 - 5.3litre w/ procharger
    2000 Wrangler - 5.3litre with some stance
    2014 Xsport- 3.5 Eco boost
    412 Motorsports

    it ain't that I'm too big to listen to the rumors, It's just that I'm too damn big to pay attention to 'em..That's the difference

  7. #7
    so would you say my cam is a better blower cam then turbo?

  8. #8
    Join Date
    Nov 2007
    Location
    Pittsburgh, PA
    Posts
    3,581
    for a heavy truck that cam should lite the turbo pretty well and have a tight power band...least how i see it. not something i would use for my RCSB but something like my crew id use it
    2002 Lightning - GT headed 5.5Litre w/ Twin 7665s
    2002 Silverado - 427Lsx w/ Twin gt4202s
    2010 Silverado crewcab Z71 - 5.3litre w/ procharger
    2000 Wrangler - 5.3litre with some stance
    2014 Xsport- 3.5 Eco boost
    412 Motorsports

    it ain't that I'm too big to listen to the rumors, It's just that I'm too damn big to pay attention to 'em..That's the difference

  9. #9
    And what do the degrees in over lap mean. Mine being -1.50 does that mean i have no overlap at all or just less of it. I put in diff cam specs and got one for -13.1 over lap. Then i tried another and got positive overlap.
    Last edited by 6.0vortecchevy; 10-26-2011 at 08:38 PM.

  10. #10
    Join Date
    Jan 2008
    Posts
    8,031
    my previous cam was a 231/235 .617.620 113+2lsa ...new F.I cam is a 222/222 .601.601 115 LXL lobes

    Pat G said my previous cam had too much overlap and dynamic compression.... now its so quiet at idle but its still untuned...
    Last edited by CHEVROLADE; 10-26-2011 at 08:37 PM.

+ Reply to Thread

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts