+ Reply to Thread
Results 1 to 9 of 9

Thread: 6.0 heads on 5.3

  1. #1
    Join Date
    Aug 2005
    Location
    Spring, Texas
    Posts
    527
    I have found a set of 6.0 LQ9 #317 heads, and was wondering if they would fit my 2002 silverado 5.3 and if so would there be a horsepower gain...
    06 TrailBlazer SS LS2 4.10's

    02 SC StepSide Factory Orange
    Full Bolt-On 370 - Little Cam- Victor Jr Intake -Worked 5.3 Heads - 4.56's - Built 60E - Circle D 4000

    07 CTS-V CAI, GM Performance Exhaust, Ported TB, Coil Overs

  2. #2
    Join Date
    Nov 2003
    Location
    Denton Texas
    Posts
    20,540
    They will interchange without any problems. The heads have the same flow characteristics as the LS6 head. BTW, 317 heads are LQ4 low HP heads, not LQ9. You will lose compression with the 317 or 035 LQ9 heads on your truck. you either have 852 or 706 heads with 61.15cc chamber volume and the 317/035 has 71.06cc chamber volume.

    I have two different manuals on LSx engines. Will Handzel's book says the 317 head casting was used on both the LQ4 and LQ9 engines. Chevy LS1/LS6 Performance by HPBooks make no mention of the 317 casting on the LQ9. Food for thought.
    See my truck data in the "My Garage" section here... http://www.ls1truck.com/forums/my-ga...tml#post191709

  3. #3
    Join Date
    Aug 2005
    Location
    Spring, Texas
    Posts
    527
    How much Estimated HP would you think, are they worth $300.00
    06 TrailBlazer SS LS2 4.10's

    02 SC StepSide Factory Orange
    Full Bolt-On 370 - Little Cam- Victor Jr Intake -Worked 5.3 Heads - 4.56's - Built 60E - Circle D 4000

    07 CTS-V CAI, GM Performance Exhaust, Ported TB, Coil Overs

  4. #4
    Join Date
    Nov 2003
    Location
    Denton Texas
    Posts
    20,540
    Nope, not worth it. THey'd be great if you were going boosted and needed to lower your compression. BTW, updated my reply.
    See my truck data in the "My Garage" section here... http://www.ls1truck.com/forums/my-ga...tml#post191709

  5. #5
    Join Date
    Aug 2005
    Location
    Spring, Texas
    Posts
    527
    thanks man, so you think it will hurt my truck more than helping it?
    06 TrailBlazer SS LS2 4.10's

    02 SC StepSide Factory Orange
    Full Bolt-On 370 - Little Cam- Victor Jr Intake -Worked 5.3 Heads - 4.56's - Built 60E - Circle D 4000

    07 CTS-V CAI, GM Performance Exhaust, Ported TB, Coil Overs

  6. #6
    Join Date
    Nov 2003
    Location
    Denton Texas
    Posts
    20,540
    I think it will hurt your performance until you get boosted. I'd buy a set of long tube headers, a cold air intake, Nelson tune, polish the throttle body, a 3200 rpm stall, LS6 cam or add a limited slip diff instead.
    See my truck data in the "My Garage" section here... http://www.ls1truck.com/forums/my-ga...tml#post191709

  7. #7
    Join Date
    Jan 2005
    Location
    Conway, AR
    Posts
    1,353
    Yeah i am sticking with my stock heads because I dont intend on adding a turbo or charger. I think I will just get them ported and polished and get some ASM long tubes and a 2800 stall. I had a chance to get some 6.0 heads also but passed for the same reasons as said above.

    Chris
    2009 Silverado, HPTuners, all stock.

  8. #8
    Join Date
    Apr 2003
    Location
    Mansfield, Texas, USA
    Posts
    2,462
    Don't forget the valve size is too large for the bore... 2" intake on a 3.78" bore will shroud it, kill velocity, reducing your already minimal torque.

    Keep your heads.
    The superior man is modest in his speech, but exceeds in his actions. - Confucius

    "He who asks of life nothing but the improvement of his own nature, is less liable than anyone else to miss and waste life."- Henri Frederic Amiel

    '01 Chev Z71 LT - '85 BMW 745i TURBO - '88 BMW 750iL - '88 Ford F150 XLT Lariat - '79 MB 240D - '79 MB 280S Euro
    '80 MB 380SE-5.0 Euro - '85 MB 300SD - '87 MB 300SDL - 1990 MB 300SEL - '91 MB 300SE - '91 MB 560SEL

    Let's face it, the red hair... makes 'em wet.


  9. #9
    Join Date
    Sep 2005
    Posts
    8
    sounds like a tune would do the most for the least. That sounds like a great engine for about 8 lbs of boost.

+ Reply to Thread

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts