+ Reply to Thread
Page 1 of 5 1 2 3 ... LastLast
Results 1 to 10 of 41

Thread: 408 on the dyno friday

  1. #1
    Join Date
    Mar 2009
    Location
    Oolitic In
    Posts
    162

    408 on the dyno friday

    Well its been over a year now since the 5.3 took a dump on me but the 408 is in and ready for tune. Went all forged, Afr heads, with this cam
    INTAKE EXHAUST
    DURATION @ .050" 23* 24*
    ADVERTISED DURATION 28* 29*
    LOBE LIFT 0.38* 0.35*
    GROSS VALVE LIFT 0.649 0.609

    LOBE SEPARATION 111
    ADVANCE GROUND IN 1

    OPEN CLOSE
    VALVE TIMING @ .050"

    INTAKE 8 BTDC 51 ABDC
    EXHAUST 52 BBDC 10 ATDC
    hopen good #s ill keep posted on this for ya

  2. #2
    Join Date
    Mar 2009
    Location
    Oolitic In
    Posts
    162
    well its at 464 but its not geting enough air up top. so im guessing the cold air i got for the 5.3 isnt big enough along with the stock mass air... Its also throwing a code at 6200 and i cant fig out why any help on this. i cant remeber code off topof my head ill get it tomarrow

  3. #3
    Join Date
    Mar 2011
    Location
    Amarillo TX
    Posts
    199
    are you running the stock 5.3 MAF? that might be the problem. need to go bigger!

  4. #4
    Join Date
    Nov 2007
    Location
    Pittsburgh, PA
    Posts
    3,581
    so a MS4 in a 408?

    im betting torque is around 415-422

    your numbers are about right for that combo,enjoy your combo
    2002 Lightning - GT headed 5.5Litre w/ Twin 7665s
    2002 Silverado - 427Lsx w/ Twin gt4202s
    2010 Silverado crewcab Z71 - 5.3litre w/ procharger
    2000 Wrangler - 5.3litre with some stance
    2014 Xsport- 3.5 Eco boost
    412 Motorsports

    it ain't that I'm too big to listen to the rumors, It's just that I'm too damn big to pay attention to 'em..That's the difference

  5. #5
    Join Date
    Jan 2010
    Location
    Cedar Park
    Posts
    898
    I would think a bigger cam would be in order for those cubes.
    2012 Ford F-150 Ecoboost Super Crew 4x4, stock and staying that way.
    2001 chevy green = LS1 stock, 3k stall, 373 posi, tuned by LSX Power in CS TX

  6. #6
    Join Date
    Mar 2009
    Location
    Oolitic In
    Posts
    162
    Quote Originally Posted by Quik View Post
    so a MS4 in a 408?

    im betting torque is around 415-422

    your numbers are about right for that combo,enjoy your combo
    Yes you are correct. The tq was 424, but still can't understand why its throwing a code one time at 6200 then the next time its not. And yes its still the 5.3 maf who makes a bigger one? Im not getting enough air threw it for the top end

  7. #7
    Join Date
    Nov 2007
    Location
    Pittsburgh, PA
    Posts
    3,581
    all the mafs are the same for the gmt800 trucks. if maf size is restriction time to go SD
    Quote Originally Posted by maze2525 View Post
    Yes you are correct. The tq was 424, but still can't understand why its throwing a code one time at 6200 then the next time its not. And yes its still the 5.3 maf who makes a bigger one? Im not getting enough air threw it for the top end
    2002 Lightning - GT headed 5.5Litre w/ Twin 7665s
    2002 Silverado - 427Lsx w/ Twin gt4202s
    2010 Silverado crewcab Z71 - 5.3litre w/ procharger
    2000 Wrangler - 5.3litre with some stance
    2014 Xsport- 3.5 Eco boost
    412 Motorsports

    it ain't that I'm too big to listen to the rumors, It's just that I'm too damn big to pay attention to 'em..That's the difference

  8. #8
    Join Date
    Mar 2009
    Location
    Oolitic In
    Posts
    162
    So no one makes a bigger one for these trucks..... and y sd thought they went away from that for a reason.... just askn questions cause this kind of build is all new to me. Is it cause its n.a? I plan on turbo and cam for turbo later on. Is the sd what everyone doing for trunk also?

  9. #9
    Join Date
    Nov 2007
    Location
    Pittsburgh, PA
    Posts
    3,581
    you can get a 100mm maf but what is the point? youre not going to gain performance from it, if you want to spend another few hundred dollars on a part that isnt going to gain you anything then go right ahead.
    Quote Originally Posted by maze2525 View Post
    So no one makes a bigger one for these trucks..... and y sd thought they went away from that for a reason.... just askn questions cause this kind of build is all new to me. Is it cause its n.a? I plan on turbo and cam for turbo later on. Is the sd what everyone doing for trunk also?
    2002 Lightning - GT headed 5.5Litre w/ Twin 7665s
    2002 Silverado - 427Lsx w/ Twin gt4202s
    2010 Silverado crewcab Z71 - 5.3litre w/ procharger
    2000 Wrangler - 5.3litre with some stance
    2014 Xsport- 3.5 Eco boost
    412 Motorsports

    it ain't that I'm too big to listen to the rumors, It's just that I'm too damn big to pay attention to 'em..That's the difference

  10. #10
    Join Date
    May 2008
    Posts
    216
    i was about to say the same on cam, being an ms4...like quik mentioned.....lol

    good # enjoy your new found power

+ Reply to Thread

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts